New York, NY – A forensic pathologist testified in defense of Daniel Penny, a military-trained commuter charged with the death of Jordan Neely in a subway altercation. Dr. Satish Chundru disputed the initial findings that Neely died as a result of Penny’s chokehold, claiming that the restraint was not the cause of death. The incident, where Neely, a Black, homeless, and mentally ill individual, was restrained by Penny, a white Marine veteran, has sparked controversy regarding race, self-defense, and vigilantism.
Chundru’s testimony emphasized that the medical evidence did not support the claim that Neely died from the chokehold. He pointed out discrepancies in the bruising on Neely’s neck and the lack of specific signs of fatal chokeholds. Despite the city medical examiner’s conclusion that Neely died due to the chokehold, Chundru argued that synthetic marijuana, schizophrenia, and a blood condition also played a role in his death.
The prosecution challenged Chundru’s testimony, highlighting differences between his statements and existing medical literature. Dr. Cynthia Harris, who performed Neely’s autopsy, previously stated that the chokehold caused his death. The trial has seen conflicting testimonies regarding the level of restraint applied by Penny, with a Marine Corps combat instructor testifying that Penny did not use the chokehold properly.
Neely’s behavior on the subway, characterized by erratic movements and threats, led to the altercation between him and Penny. While Penny’s defense claims he acted in self-defense and to protect other passengers, prosecutors argue that he exerted excessive force for too long. The incident, captured in bystander videos, has raised questions about proper restraint techniques and the use of force in such situations.
Penny, facing charges of manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide, maintains his innocence. Neely, known for entertaining subway riders as a Michael Jackson impersonator, had a history of psychiatric issues and drug problems. The trial continues to shed light on the complexities of urban life, racial tensions, and the blurred lines between self-defense and vigilantism.