Lake Tahoe, Nevada – After the recent debate between Vice-President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump, viewers across the country expressed a range of opinions on the candidates’ performances. Some feel Harris was a strong contender, while others believe Trump held his ground.
In an interview, Tobi, a public school teacher from Michigan, shared concerns about Harris’s stance on Israel-Gaza, describing it as a missed opportunity for Trump. Despite this, Tobi expressed trust in Harris, emphasizing a preference for her over Trump based on past actions and statements.
On the other hand, Sam Smith, a tech worker from Lake Tahoe, Nevada, critiqued Harris for not delivering “knockout punches” during the debate. While Smith still plans to vote for Harris, he highlighted the importance of strong policies and detailed plans for undecided voters.
Paul B from Pennsylvania found the debate a refreshing change from previous encounters, praising Harris for her ability to draw Trump off-message. Paul mentioned Harris’s clarity on economic and homeowner-related issues, emphasizing the need for specificity on topics like immigration and Israel-Palestine.
Reflecting on the debate, HS from North Carolina noted Trump’s evasion of questions and Harris’s truthful demeanor. As an independent leaning towards Harris, HS highlighted the importance of clear plans to address ongoing socioeconomic issues.
Ted Kemm, a retired industrial engineer from Pennsylvania, expressed embarrassment over Trump’s behavior, noting a shift in the Republican party’s values. Ted praised Harris for her leadership qualities and expressed a desire to vote for her in the upcoming election.
In contrast, Josh, an engineer from North Carolina, commended Harris for her strength and ability to handle pressure during the debate. Josh, who voted for Trump in 2016 and Biden in 2020, shared intentions to support Harris in the next election.
The debate also caught the attention of Amber, a stay-at-home mom and student from Arizona. Amber highlighted the contrast between the candidates’ approaches, particularly Trump’s fearmongering rhetoric and Harris’s direct communication with viewers. She noted Harris’s preparedness and strength as factors influencing her voting decision.
However, Alexander Stafford, a retired teacher from Georgia, expressed skepticism towards Harris’s performance, citing a lack of believability and reactive behavior. Despite his discontent with Trump, Alexander questioned his voting decision for the upcoming election.
Meanwhile, James, a healthcare worker from Wisconsin, found humor in Trump’s vague healthcare plans, solidifying his confidence in voting for Harris. James viewed the debate as an opportunity to challenge falsehoods and reaffirm his support for the Democratic candidate.
Lastly, Suzanne Baker, a retired anthropology professor from Michigan, praised Harris for her poise and humanity during the debate. Suzanne resonated with Harris’s authenticity and professionalism, solidifying her decision to vote for the Vice-President in the upcoming election.