**College Football Playoff Expansion Has CFP Committee Facing Tough Decisions in Choosing Top 12 Teams**

Atlanta, Georgia – The College Football Playoff selection process will undergo significant changes as the field expands to 12 teams starting in the 2024 season. The expansion to a 5+7 model will not only impact which teams receive at-large bids to compete for a national title but also determine if a first-round participant will host a game on its home turf or play away. With this expansion, the responsibility of the College Football Playoff Selection Committee will increase exponentially.

In the past, selecting the top four teams for the College Football Playoff was relatively straightforward, with the real challenge often lying in seeding teams from Nos. 5-12. However, as the playoff field grows, the committee will face more pressure to accurately determine the worthy contenders. The process of choosing the best teams involves meticulous analysis and comparison of various data points, with each committee member casting their votes to finalize the rankings.

One of the key factors considered by the selection committee is a team’s record against opponents ranked in the previous week’s top 25. However, relying on a static top 25 list may not provide a comprehensive view of a team’s strength, leading to potential biases in the rankings. To address this issue, there are suggestions to adopt a system similar to college basketball’s NET ratings, which could offer a more objective and updated assessment of team performances.

Introducing objective metrics, such as opponent-adjusted ratings and efficiency ratings, could enhance the selection process by providing a more accurate evaluation of teams beyond traditional statistics like total yards or scoring offense. Incorporating predictive metrics alongside result-based metrics could offer a more balanced and transparent approach to selecting playoff contenders.

While the use of models and data analysis can complement the committee’s decision-making process, it is crucial to maintain a human element in the selection process. By incorporating objective data as a sorting tool, the committee can ensure a fair and evidence-based evaluation of teams vying for playoff spots, thereby increasing transparency and credibility in the selection process.

As college football continues to evolve and grow, it is essential for the evaluation process to adapt and incorporate innovative approaches to selecting playoff teams. By embracing objective analysis and expanding the criteria for evaluating team performances, the College Football Playoff Selection Committee can ensure a more comprehensive and equitable selection process for all teams involved.