Wilmington, Delaware – Hunter Biden, the son of President Joe Biden, has been found guilty of federal felony gun charges by a Delaware jury. Despite the verdict, Hunter Biden still has options for appeal to challenge his conviction. His defense team filed three motions for acquittal last Friday, which are pending a ruling from Judge Maryellen Noreika.
Defense attorney Abbe Lowell expressed disappointment with the guilty verdict and stated that they will continue to pursue all legal avenues for Hunter Biden’s defense. During the trial, his lawyers attempted to cast doubt on the government’s evidence linking his abuse of crack cocaine to the purchase and possession of a firearm in October 2018. However, experts believe that his appeal may lean heavily on two constitutional arguments.
One potential argument for appeal is based on the Second Amendment, contending that the charges against Hunter Biden are not in line with constitutional gun rights. The Supreme Court’s recent decision on gun rights has created a new standard for evaluating gun laws. Another avenue for appeal is related to the Sixth Amendment, focusing on defendant rights in criminal proceedings. Hunter Biden’s defense team tried to introduce a second version of a firearms registration form as evidence, but it was ultimately excluded from trial.
Despite facing a maximum penalty of 25 years in prison and hefty fines, Hunter Biden’s status as a first-time offender may impact the outcome of his sentencing. The case has significant implications, especially in light of recent legal developments surrounding gun laws and Second Amendment rights.
Overall, Hunter Biden’s guilty verdict sets the stage for a potential appeal process that may delve into constitutional arguments and procedural issues, with broader implications for gun control laws and individual rights in the United States.