New York, USA – In a recent development, a federal judge cast doubts on the credibility of Michael Cohen, former lawyer to ex-President Donald Trump. The judge’s remarks came as Cohen sought to be released from court supervision, a request that was ultimately denied.
During a written order, Judge Jesse M Furman raised concerns about Cohen’s truthfulness, particularly noting discrepancies in his testimony at Trump’s civil fraud trial. Cohen had previously pleaded guilty to various crimes, including tax evasion, lying to banks and Congress, and violating campaign finance laws.
Furman highlighted how Cohen had denied guilt for tax evasion during the civil fraud trial, only to later admit to lying under oath about the same charges. This inconsistency led the judge to question whether Cohen had committed perjury at some point.
Despite Cohen’s efforts to distance himself from past wrongdoings, the judge emphasized the importance of holding him accountable for his crimes. This decision to maintain court supervision over Cohen has drawn criticism from Trump, who has repeatedly attacked Cohen’s credibility.
In response to the judge’s findings, Cohen’s lawyer, E Danya Perry, disputed the conclusion, calling it “factually inaccurate and legally incorrect.” Perry argued that Cohen had never disputed the facts of his conduct and suggested that he had been coerced into accepting plea deals.
Trump’s legal team seized on Furman’s ruling, stating that it confirmed Cohen’s perjury and calling for his prosecution. The ongoing legal battle between Cohen and Trump is set to continue, with Cohen playing a key role in the hush-money criminal trial against the former president.
The case, which has seen delays due to last-minute evidence submissions, remains a focal point in the legal saga between Cohen and Trump. As the trial unfolds, the credibility and integrity of key witnesses like Cohen will continue to be scrutinized.