Los Angeles, CA – Logan Paul, co-founder of Prime Hydration, is facing a lawsuit over allegations of ‘forever chemicals’ being found in the energy drinks produced by his company. The court document, made public during a recent motion hearing on April 18, claims that the products are “adulterated, misbranded and illegal to sell.” The lawsuit specifically focuses on elevated levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAs) found in Prime Hydration’s Grape Sports Drink.
PFAs are synthetic chemicals known for their harmful effects on both human health and the environment, earning them the nickname ‘forever chemicals’. Despite Prime Hydration’s claims of adhering to Good Manufacturing Practices set by the FDA, a third-party test reportedly found ‘material levels’ of PFAs in the drink that exceeded recommended health advisories for drinking water by three times.
In response to the lawsuit, Logan Paul took to social media to address the accusations. He refuted the claims, insisting that the chemicals in question are from the plastic bottles used for packaging the drink, not the actual liquid. Paul defended the company’s manufacturing practices and emphasized the rigorous filtration process used to ensure the purity of their products.
Moreover, Paul criticized the validity of the study referenced in the court document, highlighting discrepancies in the reported PPT levels and challenging the evidence presented. Despite the controversy, Prime Hydration remains steadfast in its commitment to meeting regulatory standards and ensuring the safety of its products.
The dispute has sparked a public feud between Paul and a TikToker known as tommythelawyer, who raised concerns about the chemical composition of Prime Hydration’s drinks. Paul called for an apology from tommythelawyer within 48 hours, threatening legal action if one is not issued promptly.
As the legal battle unfolds, Prime Hydration continues to defend its reputation and product integrity. The outcome of this lawsuit could have far-reaching implications for the company and the energy drink industry at large. It remains to be seen how this controversy will impact consumer trust and regulatory oversight in the future.