**Republican** Rep Threatens Vote to Oust **House Speaker** After **Approval of Aid to Ukraine**

Atlanta, Georgia – Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene has publicly criticized House Speaker Mike Johnson for his support of a new aid package for Ukraine. Greene went as far as threatening to call for a vote on his removal if he does not resign. This move comes after Johnson joined forces with Democrats to pass a $95 billion foreign aid bill, which includes $61 billion allocated for Ukraine and its neighboring countries. The bill passed with the support of 210 Democrats and 101 Republicans in the House, and is now awaiting final approval in the Senate.

Greene, along with other Republican lawmakers, has expressed their disapproval of Johnson’s actions and have indicated their support for an effort to remove him from his position as speaker. Despite Johnson’s insistence that he has not sought support from Democrats to defend his position, some senior Republicans believe that they could rely on bipartisan support to thwart any motion to vacate the speaker’s chair.

The situation has caused a rift within the Republican party, with differing opinions on whether Johnson should be ousted from his role. Representative Ro Khanna, a Democrat from California, has stated that he would vote against a motion to remove Johnson from the speakership, acknowledging that while they may disagree on various issues, Johnson made the right decision in this instance.

Greene, on the other hand, has been vocal in her criticism of Johnson, accusing him of betraying Republican voters with his actions. Despite facing backlash, Johnson remains undeterred, asserting that he has acted in the best interest of the House and upholding his duty as speaker. The ongoing debate highlights the divisions within the GOP and the challenges faced by party leaders in navigating internal disagreements.

As the situation continues to unfold, it remains uncertain whether Johnson will face a formal vote on his removal. The outcome of this conflict could have significant implications for the future dynamics of the Republican party and its leadership.