Trump’s False Assassination Claim Exposed! Find Out Why He Wasn’t Even in Florida During FBI Search

West Palm Beach, Florida – Donald Trump’s campaign has stirred controversy by making false claims against rival Joe Biden, alleging that Biden had authorized the use of deadly force to harm or kill Trump during an FBI search at his Mar-a-Lago estate in August 2022.

The baseless claim, originating from a misquoted section of FBI policy in a legal motion, has gained traction among some Trump supporters who refer to it as an “attempted assassination.” However, Trump was not present in Florida at the time of the search, debunking the allegations.

In a recent fundraising email to supporters, Trump doubled down on the unfounded claim, portraying himself as a victim of political persecution orchestrated by the Radical Left. The email called for donations and urged supporters to stand by him in the face of alleged politically motivated raids, indictments, and arrests.

Contrary to Trump’s narrative, the FBI clarified that the use of deadly force is only permitted when an officer reasonably believes there is an imminent threat of death or serious injury to themselves or others. The search at Mar-a-Lago was conducted in coordination with Trump’s Secret Service detail, following standard procedures for executing a search warrant.

Trump’s legal battles since leaving office have reportedly cost him over $100 million, largely funded by donations to his political action committee and campaign funds. With these accounts running low, Trump’s campaign is using sensationalized claims of persecution to appeal for financial support.

Despite the ongoing legal challenges, the notion that the government is biased against Trump serves as a potent fundraising tool for his campaign. As Trump faces trial on campaign finance charges in New York, his rhetoric of being targeted by political adversaries continues to resonate with his supporters.

With the trial nearing its conclusion, both Trump and Biden are poised to capitalize politically on the outcome. Biden, planning to address the matter post-verdict, may choose to do so from the White House rather than the campaign trail to maintain a sense of nonpartisanship. However, in the escalating political climate, both candidates’ responses are likely to be viewed through a political lens.

As the trial unfolds and the verdict looms, the intense political drama surrounding Trump’s legal battles is a testament to the deeply polarized landscape of American politics, where allegations of corruption and abuse of power fuel fervent debates and shape public opinion.