LOS ANGELES, California – UCLA Chancellor Gene Block is facing a storm of criticism from faculty members calling for his resignation amidst mounting backlash over his handling of a recent violent clash on campus. The uproar stems from a police crackdown on a pro-Palestinian protest encampment, which resulted in over 200 arrests and allegations of mishandling the situation.
The UCLA Academic Senate, comprised of both tenured and tenure-track faculty, is gearing up to vote on motions of censure and no-confidence against Chancellor Block. The motions condemn Block for his alleged failure to ensure the safety of students during the events that transpired last week on the Westwood campus. While the vote holds no legal power, it reflects a significant moment for Block as he nears the end of his 17-year tenure.
The turmoil at UCLA began on April 25 when students established a protest encampment to voice solidarity with Palestinians, denounce Israel’s actions in Gaza, and push for divestment from companies linked to the Israeli military. Initially peaceful, the encampment eventually led to clashes with a violent mob and a prolonged police intervention, sparking further outrage within the UCLA community.
Critics have pointed fingers at various university officials, including UCLA Police Chief John Thomas, for their roles in the escalation of tensions. The aftermath of the incident prompted demands for accountability, with over 900 faculty and staff members across the University of California system calling for Block’s resignation and amnesty for those involved in the protest.
In response to the backlash, UCLA has initiated internal and external reviews of the events that unfolded, with plans to bolster campus security measures. The creation of a new chief safety officer position signals a proactive effort to address concerns raised by faculty and students regarding safety protocols and response strategies in the future.
As the debate rages on within the UCLA community, differing perspectives and opinions have emerged, further deepening divisions among faculty members and administrators. The ongoing discussions reflect a broader conversation around free speech, campus safety, and the role of university leadership in navigating contentious issues.